Bug 283701
Summary: | Review Request: vecmath1.2 - Free version of vecmath from the Java3D 1.2 specification | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Hans de Goede <hdegoede> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Gwyn Ciesla <gwync> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, kevin, notting |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | gwync:
fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2007-10-17 20:19:02 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Hans de Goede
2007-09-08 20:02:03 UTC
Builds, local F7 and mock rawhide. rpmlint: vecmath1.2-javadoc.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm Everything else looks OK on review. (In reply to comment #1) > Builds, local F7 and mock rawhide. > rpmlint: > vecmath1.2-javadoc.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm > This is normal, all java packages use this maghick to properly handle the javadoc symlinks. All right then. :) APPROVED. Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vecmath1.2 Short Description: Free version of vecmath from the Java3D 1.2 specification Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: devel only InitialCC: <empty> Cvsextras Commits: Yes Should this package really be named 'vecmath1.2' and not just 'vecmath'? Made sense to me, as the 1.2 refers to a Java3D spec version, not an application version. On the other hand, does this help it avoid a collision? Is there a version of vecmath that supports another version? This is the name upstream uses, also notice that this is vecmath1.2 version 1.14, where else should I put the 1.2? Also notice that as is it works rather nice for the .spec file, Source0 = %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz, and no -n to %setup is needed. I see. It just seemed odd to have a package with . in the name, hopefully it won't cause any issues with yum or rpm behavior. There is already at least one other package like that however, so I don't think it will. Sorry for the delay here. cvs done. Imported and build, closing. |