Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/vecmath1.2.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/vecmath1.2-1.14-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This is an unofficial implementation (java source code) of the javax.vecmath package specified in the Java(TM) 3D API 1.2 . The package includes classes for 3-space vector/point, 4-space vector, 4x4, 3x3 matrix, quaternion, axis-angle combination and etc. which are often utilized for computer graphics mathematics. Most of the classes have single and double precision versions. Generic matrices' LU and SV decomposition are also there.
Builds, local F7 and mock rawhide. rpmlint: vecmath1.2-javadoc.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm Everything else looks OK on review.
(In reply to comment #1) > Builds, local F7 and mock rawhide. > rpmlint: > vecmath1.2-javadoc.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm > This is normal, all java packages use this maghick to properly handle the javadoc symlinks.
All right then. :) APPROVED.
Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vecmath1.2 Short Description: Free version of vecmath from the Java3D 1.2 specification Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: devel only InitialCC: <empty> Cvsextras Commits: Yes
Should this package really be named 'vecmath1.2' and not just 'vecmath'?
Made sense to me, as the 1.2 refers to a Java3D spec version, not an application version. On the other hand, does this help it avoid a collision? Is there a version of vecmath that supports another version?
This is the name upstream uses, also notice that this is vecmath1.2 version 1.14, where else should I put the 1.2? Also notice that as is it works rather nice for the .spec file, Source0 = %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz, and no -n to %setup is needed.
I see. It just seemed odd to have a package with . in the name, hopefully it won't cause any issues with yum or rpm behavior. There is already at least one other package like that however, so I don't think it will. Sorry for the delay here. cvs done.
Imported and build, closing.