Bug 302521
Summary: | own %{_datadir}/ghostscript/conf.d | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jens Petersen <petersen> |
Component: | filesystem | Assignee: | Phil Knirsch <pknirsch> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | i18n-bugs, lex.lists, mtasaka, rvokal |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-03-04 13:11:15 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Jens Petersen
2007-09-24 04:11:46 UTC
Also I think %_datadir/ghostscript/conf.d should be owned by filesystem. But in this case as %_datadir/ghostscript is the parent directory, I think %_datadir/ghostscript should also be owned by filesystem (to avoid ghostscript dependency). filesystem doesn't so far contain any directly application related files, so i'm not in favor of adding /usr/share/ghostscript/conf.d or even /usr/share/ghostscript to it. If the fonts would be moved to another location which ghostscript would also use that would be something different though (e.g. /usr/share/fonts will be owned by filesystem with the next build). Read ya, Phil The files in /usr/share/ghostscript/conf.d are not fonts but config files related ghostscript: mostly font aliases for CJK fonts AFAICS. Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping requested by Jens Petersen (#27995) Talked a long time with the ghostscript owner yesterday about it and we came to the same conclusion that unfortunately having those directories owned by filesystem would be the best (yet still ugly) solution. Added it to the latest filesystem package for rawhide. Thanks & regards, Phil |