Bug 325551
| Summary: | emerald can't be built for ppc64, no compiz-devel.ppc64 available | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jarod Wilson <jarod> |
| Component: | emerald | Assignee: | Nikolay Vladimirov <accounts> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 9 | CC: | krh, matthias |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | ppc64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2008-07-15 15:33:05 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 455012 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 238953 | ||
|
Description
Jarod Wilson
2007-10-09 20:33:06 UTC
Kristian - any particular reason there isn't a compiz-devel for ppc64? If there's good reason not to build it, I'd like to just CLOSED->WONTFIX this emerald bug. (In reply to comment #1) > Kristian - any particular reason there isn't a compiz-devel for ppc64? If > there's good reason not to build it, I'd like to just CLOSED->WONTFIX this > emerald bug. I don't think there's a good reason... if compiz works on ppc64, let's just enable that. Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Fixed in rawhide. libdrm is now avalilable for ppc64, so is compiz |