Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||java-1.7.0-icedtea-plugin not installed by default|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Thomas Fitzsimmons <fitzsim>|
|Component:||distribution||Assignee:||David Cantrell <dcantrell>|
|Status:||CLOSED RAWHIDE||QA Contact:||Jeremy Katz <katzj>|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2007-10-22 14:01:02 EDT||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Bug Depends On:|
Description Thomas Fitzsimmons 2007-10-10 16:22:29 EDT
A default x86 installation of Fedora 8 Test 3 includes java-1.7.0-icedtea but not java-1.7.0-icedtea-plugin. java-1.7.0-icedtea-plugin should be installed by default. Here is the relevant comps group: <group> <id>java</id> <_name>Java</_name> <_description>Support for running programs written in the Java programming language.</_description> <default>true</default> <uservisible>false</uservisible> <packagelist> <packagereq type="mandatory">java-1.5.0-gcj</packagereq> <packagereq type="default">java-1.7.0-icedtea</packagereq> <packagereq type="default">java-1.7.0-icedtea-plugin</packagereq> <packagereq type="mandatory">libgcj</packagereq> </packagelist> </group>
Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2007-10-10 16:31:03 EDT
Why wouldn't it be in the browser section?
Comment 2 Thomas Fitzsimmons 2007-10-10 16:58:13 EDT
I thought the description of the Java group matched java-1.7.0-icedtea-plugin's function, and that users used to downloading Sun's Java for a working plugin would look in the Java group first for configuring Java plugin support. Either categorization is fine by me, as long as java-1.7.0-icedtea-plugin actually gets installed by default. Any idea why that's not happening with the current comps?
Comment 3 Bill Nottingham 2007-10-10 21:49:45 EDT
Is the java group being selected in the installs you're doing?
Comment 4 Thomas Fitzsimmons 2007-10-11 07:44:19 EDT
I assume so, since java-1.5.0-gcj and java-1.7.0-icedtea are installed. Josh, did you check the state of the Java group as reported by Anaconda during the install?
Comment 5 Joshua Sumali 2007-10-11 08:51:53 EDT
I'm not sure where the state of the Java group would be reported... Is there a log recorded, or is it just something that shows up during the install?
Comment 6 Joshua Sumali 2007-10-11 14:25:11 EDT
The installs I did were just default installs, so I did not look into the Java group.
Comment 7 Bill Nottingham 2007-10-11 17:07:32 EDT
I just did a test install of rawhide, and it showed up there. Were you installing from a live image?
Comment 8 Joshua Sumali 2007-10-12 08:50:56 EDT
My install was from the dvd, so not a live image.
Comment 9 Bill Nottingham 2007-10-12 11:35:16 EDT
What version of the DVD?
Comment 10 Joshua Sumali 2007-10-12 11:48:02 EDT
Fedora 8 Test 3 i386 - 2.9G - 2007-10-04 and Fedora 8 Test 3 x86_64 - 3.5G - 2007-10-04. Both DVDs say Fedora 7.92
Comment 11 Bill Nottingham 2007-10-12 13:25:59 EDT
java-1.7.0-icedtea-plugin was not in the Fedora manifest for test2. Can we make sure it's in there for final?
Comment 12 Thomas Fitzsimmons 2007-10-18 08:57:40 EDT
Comment 13 Bill Nottingham 2007-10-18 11:04:02 EDT
Fixed in pungi hg; requires a rebuild.
Comment 14 Will Woods 2007-10-19 17:56:49 EDT
Changing status since we have a fix.. close after pungi gets rebuilt, I guess.
Comment 15 Will Woods 2007-10-22 14:01:02 EDT
Fixed with the manifest updates for F8 final (pungi-1.1.6-1.fc8)