Bug 337591
Summary: | [5.2]The information of weight/cap is a unusable parameter for starting a guest domain. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Tatsuro Enokura <fj7716hz> |
Component: | libvirt | Assignee: | Daniel Veillard <veillard> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 5.1 | CC: | fukuta.saori, xen-maint |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-05-27 13:20:45 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Tatsuro Enokura
2007-10-18 09:40:22 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed products. This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update release. This hasn't been discussed upstream, this is a feature request for libvirt and won't be accepted in U2 if this hasn't been accepted upstream first and integrated in a public libvirt release. Daniel This request was previously evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in the current Red Hat Enterprise Linux release, but Red Hat was unable to resolve it in time. This request will be reviewed for a future Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. This could be added to Update 3 if the upstream patch is clearly identified Daniel Actually this was discussed upstream and we decided to not do it, at least not in the suggested form and the thread upstream ended up at https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2008-January/msg00076.html Based on this I think the most correct is to resolve as WONTFIX, because that seems the outcome of the upstream discussions, Daniel |