Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||multiarch conflicts in namazu|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Bill Nottingham <notting>|
|Component:||namazu||Assignee:||Akira TAGOH <tagoh>|
|Status:||CLOSED RAWHIDE||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2007-12-18 05:42:32 EST||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Bug Depends On:|
Description Bill Nottingham 2007-10-19 17:51:28 EDT
namazu (or one of its subpacakges) has multiarch conflicts when installed for both i386 and x86_64 in the Fedora development tree. For help in resolving them, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MultilibTricks. file /usr/bin/namazu from install of namazu-2.0.17-2.fc8 conflicts with file from package namazu-2.0.17-2.fc8 file /usr/bin/nmz-config from install of namazu-devel-2.0.17-2.fc8 conflicts with file from package namazu-devel-2.0.17-2.fc8 (Note that this is an automated bug filing.) It would be nice to have these bugs fixed by the beta of Fedora 9.
Comment 1 Akira TAGOH 2007-10-28 20:23:21 EDT
*** Bug 228176 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Akira TAGOH 2007-11-19 01:27:47 EST
I have a separate package for shared library now. however I'm not sure if that really fixes this issue because I can even install the above version on my x86_64 box without any problems. So how can I reproduce the above conflict error?
Comment 4 Akira TAGOH 2007-11-19 19:42:09 EST
Comment 5 Akira TAGOH 2007-11-19 22:05:23 EST
Fixed in 2.0.17-3.fc9.
Comment 6 A S Alam 2007-12-18 05:42:32 EST
it is fixed, tested with following version: namazu-2.0.17-6.fc9