Bug 385131
| Summary: | F-8 branch request for gkrellm-themes | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Johan Cwiklinski <fedora> |
| Component: | gkrellm-themes | Assignee: | Johan Cwiklinski <fedora> |
| Status: | CLOSED CANTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 8 | CC: | gczarcinski, kevin |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2008-09-20 11:25:58 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Johan Cwiklinski
2007-11-15 18:02:11 UTC
humm... you took over this package when it was orphaned? Did you read: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-September/msg00111.html What is the status of the licence(s)? I had not seen this thread. I've mailed muhri.net's author about this licensing issue, waiting for him t know if this should be clarified. Otherwise, I'll close this bug and re-oprhan the package. Thanks for pointing me out. The answer I've just received is : « Hi Joan, It is very difficult for me to say, the themes are available for free and anyone submitting the themes knows that. I already have a big tar with all the themes in it. I think including a GPL assumption is a-OK. Regards, Maher » So, is it OK to consider gkrellm-themes as GPL or not ? Maybe upstream package should specify it ? I really don't know, I'm not expert on licencing issues :/ I'm no expert, however, that seems like it wouldn't be sufficent... :( Perhaps post to the fedora-devel list or fedora-legal and ask for more advice? |