Bug 385131 – F-8 branch request for gkrellm-themes

Bug 385131 - F-8 branch request for gkrellm-themes

Summary:	F-8 branch request for gkrellm-themes

Status:	CLOSED CANTFIX

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	gkrellm-themes (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	8
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	low Severity low
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Johan Cwiklinski
QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2007-11-15 13:02 EST by Johan Cwiklinski
Modified:	2008-09-20 07:25 EDT (History)
CC List:	2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2008-09-20 07:25:58 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Johan Cwiklinski 2007-11-15 13:02:11 EST

Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: gkrellm-themes
New Branches: F-8

Comment 1 Kevin Fenzi 2007-11-15 19:23:55 EST

humm... you took over this package when it was orphaned?
Did you read: 
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-September/msg00111.html

What is the status of the licence(s)?

Comment 2 Johan Cwiklinski 2007-11-16 00:30:21 EST

I had not seen this thread.

I've mailed muhri.net's author about this licensing issue, waiting for him t
know if this should be clarified.

Otherwise, I'll close this bug and re-oprhan the package.

Thanks for pointing me out.

Comment 3 Johan Cwiklinski 2007-11-17 06:41:05 EST

The answer I've just received is :

« Hi Joan,

It is very difficult for me to say, the themes are available for free and anyone
submitting the themes knows that. I already have a big tar with all the themes
in it. I think including a GPL assumption is a-OK.

Regards,
Maher »

So, is it OK to consider gkrellm-themes as GPL or not ? Maybe upstream package
should specify it ? I really don't know, I'm not expert on licencing issues :/

Comment 4 Kevin Fenzi 2007-11-17 20:26:36 EST

I'm no expert, however, that seems like it wouldn't be sufficent... :(

Perhaps post to the fedora-devel list or fedora-legal and ask for more advice?

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.