Bug 391131
Summary: | pulse cannot bind to port 539 after a restart, child processes still have it open | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Matthew Whitehead <mwhitehe> | ||||
Component: | piranha | Assignee: | Marek Grac <mgrac> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Cluster QE <mspqa-list> | ||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | 5.0 | CC: | cluster-maint, james.brown, tao | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2009-01-20 20:54:35 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Bug Depends On: | |||||||
Bug Blocks: | 433473 | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Matthew Whitehead
2007-11-19 22:27:40 UTC
Moving all RHCS ver 5 bugs to RHEL 5 so we can remove RHCS v5 which never existed. Problem confirmed. But it looks like that main problem is in stopping the applications as pulse/fos waits until all stop_cmd finish. And as long as 'fos' is running you can't run second instance. Solution that you proposed covers part of the problem - I will try to put together acceptable solution Created attachment 295430 [details]
Fixes part of the problem
This would fix the port being bound in child processes, but... the child
processes *should not* be left around after 'service pulse stop' has completed!
In Lon's patch you have to change F_[GS]ETFL to F_[GS]ETFD. Patch will be in CVS (after 5.3 release) An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0095.html |