Bug 416701

Summary: e2tools build failure
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Oliver Falk <oliver>
Component: e2toolsAssignee: Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhbugs>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 8CC: rhbugs
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: alpha   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-12-08 21:28:21 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Oliver Falk 2007-12-08 19:01:24 UTC
Can you please have a look at the folloing build log and give a comment. 

http://buildsys.zero42.at/koji/getfile?taskID=74787&name=build.log

Thx

Comment 1 Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2007-12-08 19:39:13 UTC
Probably alpha as a pure 64bit platform defines one of the int types slightly
different.

Unfortunately, there seem to be no "%XXd" type format strings where the "XX"
part always works for "unsigned 64 bit integer", so warnings like these may pop up.

Unless you want to patch that line specifically for Alpha, I'd recommend to
remove the -Werror from the %build section.


Comment 2 Oliver Falk 2007-12-08 19:42:06 UTC
Well. I should have taken a closer look. Can you %ifarch alpha this in the spec
and commit? Since Alphacore builds from Fedora cvs... Thx!

Comment 3 Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2007-12-08 19:49:49 UTC
Could you check first that this really solves the problem? There might be
similar things lurking somewhere in there.

Comment 4 Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2007-12-08 20:42:53 UTC
OK, it is in CVS now.

Comment 5 Oliver Falk 2007-12-08 20:53:01 UTC
I've added it to the build queue... Will let you know as soon as it finishes.

Comment 6 Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2007-12-08 21:28:21 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 349851 ***

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 349851 ***

Comment 7 Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2007-12-08 22:29:56 UTC
OK, this (0.0.16-6) fails on ppc64 as well. More discussion and resolution over
at #349851.