Bug 426230
| Summary: | Review Request: perl-Test-Unit - the PerlUnit testing framework | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Xavier Bachelot <xavier> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Jason Tibbitts <j> |
| Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, notting |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | j:
fedora-review+
tcallawa: fedora-cvs+ |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2007-12-22 16:25:37 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 426228 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
Xavier Bachelot
2007-12-19 13:23:10 UTC
rpmlint gives a clean output except : perl-Test-Unit.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/perl-Test-Unit-0.25/examples/Experimental/Sample.pm perl(Exporter) Not sure how to fix that. (In reply to comment #1) > rpmlint gives a clean output except : > perl-Test-Unit.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency > /usr/share/doc/perl-Test-Unit-0.25/examples/Experimental/Sample.pm perl(Exporter) > > Not sure how to fix that. See the first section of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl A couple of issues are similar to those from the Class::Inner package: License: tag should be GPL+ or Artistic. Summary doesn't really need the name of the Perl module, but it's not a big deal. The comment before the BuildRequires: looks like it was part of a template. (The same comment might have been in the Class::Inner package; maybe I missed it.) Some of the things provided by this package look a bit odd: perl(Experimental::Sample) It looks like this comes from one of the examples, which would mean that if you did a --nodocs installation you wouldn't actually get the file which provides the symbol. perl(Tk::ArrayBar) I guess this is OK; the package really creates this widget. perl(fail_example) perl(fail_example_testsuite_setup) It looks like these come from the examples as well. Documentation really shouldn't generate additional dependency information, so those three provided symbols should be filtered. Checklist: * source files match upstream: 5bd36b7262b849aef07510df53081f3858893a583021f8e831d9a497be31dfaf Test-Unit-0.25.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field is not correct. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Experimental::Sample) perl(Test::Unit) = 0.25 perl(Test::Unit::Assert) perl(Test::Unit::Assertion) perl(Test::Unit::Assertion::Boolean) perl(Test::Unit::Assertion::CodeRef) perl(Test::Unit::Assertion::Exception) perl(Test::Unit::Assertion::Regexp) perl(Test::Unit::Debug) perl(Test::Unit::Decorator) perl(Test::Unit::Error) perl(Test::Unit::Exception) perl(Test::Unit::Failure) perl(Test::Unit::HarnessUnit) perl(Test::Unit::Listener) perl(Test::Unit::Loader) perl(Test::Unit::Procedural) perl(Test::Unit::Result) perl(Test::Unit::Runner) perl(Test::Unit::Runner::Terminal) perl(Test::Unit::Setup) perl(Test::Unit::Test) perl(Test::Unit::TestCase) perl(Test::Unit::TestRunner) perl(Test::Unit::TestSuite) perl(Test::Unit::TkTestRunner) perl(Test::Unit::Tutorial) perl(Test::Unit::UnitHarness) = 1.1502 perl(Test::Unit::UnitHarness::Exception) perl(Test::Unit::UnitHarness::TestCase) perl(Test::Unit::Warning) perl(Tk::ArrayBar) perl(fail_example) perl(fail_example_testsuite_setup) perl-Test-Unit = 0.25-2.fc9 = /usr/bin/perl perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Benchmark) perl(Carp) perl(Class::Inner) perl(Config) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Devel::Symdump) perl(Error) perl(FileHandle) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(Test::Unit) perl(Test::Unit::Assertion) perl(Test::Unit::Assertion::CodeRef) perl(Test::Unit::Debug) perl(Test::Unit::Error) perl(Test::Unit::Exception) perl(Test::Unit::Failure) perl(Test::Unit::Loader) perl(Test::Unit::Result) perl(Test::Unit::TestCase) perl(Test::Unit::TestRunner) perl(Test::Unit::TestSuite) perl(Test::Unit::TkTestRunner) perl(Test::Unit::UnitHarness) perl(Test::Unit::Warning) perl(Tk) perl(Tk::BrowseEntry) perl(Tk::Canvas) perl(Tk::DialogBox) perl(Tk::ROText) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(overload) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=89, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.86 cusr + 0.08 csys = 0.94 CPU) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. X %docs generate provided symbols, which might not actually be provided in a --nodocs installation. All points above fixed in : http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SRPMS/perl-Test-Unit-0.25-3.fc8.src.rpm Yes, looks good to me. APPROVED Thx Tibbs New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Test-Unit Short Description: the PerlUnit testing framework Owners: xavierb Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes cvs done Thx Spot. Imported and built for devel and F-8. |