Bug 426502

Summary: SELinux audit messages "/bin/umount (mount_t) "read write" to socket:[NNN] (automount_t)"
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Reporter: Ian Kent <ikent>
Component: autofs5Assignee: Ian Kent <ikent>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: qe-baseos-daemons
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 4.7CC: duck, jmoyer, rwheeler
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Reopened
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-01-25 18:27:36 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 452122, 993477    
Bug Blocks:    

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2007-12-21 15:54:58 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.

Comment 2 Barry Donahue 2008-02-18 21:10:00 UTC
Manual test in comment #14

Comment 3 Jeff Moyer 2008-02-18 21:22:53 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Manual test in comment #14

Again, there actually is an rhts test for this.  /CoreOS/autofs/bugzillas,
subtest bz233481.

Cheers.

Comment 4 Ian Kent 2008-02-19 03:09:10 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > Manual test in comment #14
> 
> Again, there actually is an rhts test for this.  /CoreOS/autofs/bugzillas,
> subtest bz233481.

I'm seem to remember this test either didn't trigger the bug
or the problem has been fixed in the current package by other
work that has been done.

I'll need to check.


Comment 5 Ian Kent 2008-04-15 05:32:02 UTC
The corresponding RHEL-5 bug has been deferred so
I'm doing the same here.

Comment 6 RHEL Program Management 2008-09-23 02:43:30 UTC
Development Management has reviewed and declined this request.  You may appeal
this decision by reopening this request.

Comment 7 Ian Kent 2008-09-23 02:59:24 UTC
Oops, that's not what I intended.

Comment 8 RHEL Program Management 2008-09-24 20:25:29 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.