Bug 426985 (php-suhosin)
Summary: | Review Request: php-suhosin - Suhosin extension for the php language | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Bart Vanbrabant <bart.vanbrabant> | ||||
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Adam Tkac <atkac> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | low | ||||||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | atkac, fedora, fedora-package-review, huzaifas, itamar, kevin, nfoxie, notting, ovasik, pvrabec, redhat, susi.lehtola, tmraz | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | atkac:
fedora-review+
j: fedora-cvs+ |
||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2008-11-10 16:56:23 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Bart Vanbrabant
2007-12-29 11:00:01 UTC
I am not a sponsor so i cannot review your package, i can only comment on it. [root@dhcp1-17 ~]# rpmlint php-suhosin-0.9.22-1.fc8.src.rpm php-suhosin.src: W: invalid-license PHP License See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing Everything else looks ok to me, atleast in the first glance. I can see the newer spec file there, just the new srpm. A dirty browser cache? I can see it with two different browsers. Ah my bad. Spec seems ok now Thanks. As i'm not a sponsor, only a few comments. - lastest version is 0.9.23 - you should requires php(zend-abi) (not php(zend-api)) - use %setup -q -n suhosin-%{version} (which simplify other part) - no need to requires php-common as the php(zend-abi) assure ABI compatibility of extension. It will be great to provides a config file with some recommended value (for ex : suhosin.log.sapi=S_ALL, and probably others) Do you succeed to run the test suite ? Thanks for the remarks. I'll update it one of the next days. Created attachment 304019 [details]
Updated SPEC file, works for me, only header changed
Try this one...
Update spec file and srpm is available at http://bart.ulyssis.org/fedora/php-suhosin/ Would really be nice to have that package ... +1 I will take care about this review. - spec looks fine for me - mock build OK - rpmlint doesn't print any error/warning => Reviewed. Anyone willing to sponsor me? I've added myself to the packager group and I'm awaiting approval. I have rereviewed the package and it seems to be OK. I will sponsor you. Thx. I'm not able to request a cvs module. The select box for the fedora-cvs flag is stilled greyed out -> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure What should I do or what am I doing wrong? Weird, I can set the flag without problems. Perhaps there are some sync problems between bugzilla and Fedora Account System? I think you are member of all the groups you need to be in FAS so that should not be a problem. Can you try to relogin into bugzila and if that doesn't help can you report the problem to the bugzilla-owner ? The sync between FAS and bugzilla is currently being done manually, about once per day. Reporting this to the bugzilla people is not productive as it is not their fault. I have added this information to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-suhosin Short Description: Suhosin extension for the php language Owners: pvrabec Branches: InitialCC: Bart I don't want to be maintainer of this package I just want it to be available in F10, therefore I filed this CVS request. We can switch as soon as possible. Thanks. At least for the next I won't be able to do much because I can only access the internet from my work. After that I should have a connection at home again. Bart / Peter: I see Bart in the packager group... would you like me to process the request with him as owner? For me this is ok, but I don't have any problem whatsoever if someone else is the owner. I've got the time to maintain it so I would at least want co-maintainership. (In reply to comment #21) > Bart / Peter: I see Bart in the packager group... would you like me to process > the request with him as owner? Bart: owner me: co-maintainer thnx. cvs done. Package were built, closing Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-suhosin New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: zoeloelip CVS done. Can someone please push php-suhosin-0.9.32.1-1.fc14 to updates? |