Bug 427328
| Summary: | Please branch for EPEL 4, 5 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jonathan Dieter <jonathan> |
| Component: | popt | Assignee: | Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla> |
| Status: | CLOSED CANTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | pmatilai |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2008-01-03 07:19:36 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Jonathan Dieter
2008-01-03 06:04:21 UTC
Jonathan, it is not possible to branch popt from Fedora 8/Rawhide to EPEL,
because popt is already in RHEL and EPEL is not allowed to replace any base
package. Please use the popt which is already there (and bundled with RPM).
The version is older and you've to "BuildRequire: %{_includedir}/popt.h", if
you don't want to "BuildRequire: popt" on RHEL 4, RHEL 5, Fedora 7 and then
"BuildRequire: popt-devel" on Fedora 8 and Rawhide - at least, that's how I'm
working smart around this.
As branching Fedora 8/Rawhide popt is never possible for EPEL, I'll close
this bug report with CAN'T FIX now.
Sorry, that's my bad. I completely forgot that F8 had changed the BuildRequire to popt-devel, so I just assumed popt as a whole wasn't in RHEL (and knew it wasn't in EPEL). My apologies for the noise. |