Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||Liberation fonts need to be updated to latest font|
|Product:||Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5||Reporter:||Richard Monk <rmonk>|
|Component:||liberation-fonts||Assignee:||Caius Chance <me>|
|Status:||CLOSED ERRATA||QA Contact:|
|Version:||5.1||CC:||eng-i18n-bugs, fonts-bugs, petersen|
|Fixed In Version:||RHBA-2008-0071||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2008-02-06 13:59:56 EST||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Bug Depends On:|
|Bug Blocks:||430240, 431218|
Description Richard Monk 2008-01-07 11:22:33 EST
The final results for the Liberation fonts are attached to this bug. These are from Brian Kraimer at Ascender: email@example.com
Comment 1 Richard Monk 2008-01-07 11:22:33 EST
Created attachment 290976 [details] Latest liberation fonts from Ascender
Comment 2 Caius Chance 2008-01-09 01:36:22 EST
File seems corrupted?
Comment 3 Jens Petersen 2008-01-09 23:32:15 EST
Fixed by changing mime-type to application/octet-stream.
Comment 8 Caius Chance 2008-01-11 01:11:54 EST
Hi jensp, I need a el5 to ensure build in the same env: http://download.brisbane.redhat.com/~cchance/packaging/liberation-fonts/liberation-fonts.spec http://download.brisbane.redhat.com/~cchance/packaging/liberation-fonts/liberation-fonts-1.0-1.fc8.testing.src.rpm
Comment 9 Nicolas Mailhot 2008-01-13 04:56:50 EST
Please also update the Fedora packages (if you need some testing for example)
Comment 10 Caius Chance 2008-01-13 18:31:55 EST
(In reply to comment #9) > Please also update the Fedora packages (if you need some testing for example) sure.
Comment 13 RHEL Product and Program Management 2008-01-15 19:37:39 EST
This bugzilla was reviewed by QE as a non-FasTrack request. It has since been proposed for FasTrack. The qa_ack has been reset. QE needs to re-review this bugzilla for FasTrack.
Comment 15 Caius Chance 2008-01-16 01:07:05 EST
Comment 19 errata-xmlrpc 2008-02-06 13:59:56 EST
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0071.html
Comment 20 Cody Boisclair 2008-02-17 00:13:41 EST
These also need to be posted on http://www.redhat.com/promo/fonts/ for the benefit of non-RH users.
Comment 21 Bryan J Smith 2008-02-17 12:33:33 EST
Created attachment 295106 [details] liberation-fonts-1.0-1.zip [ Liberation Fonts from EL5 source, 2007-Dec release with hinting ] Second Cody Bosisclair (firstname.lastname@example.org). I (GPS) am at a client site having to exchange with Windows and the December fonts are infinitely better than the May release. I'm doing my best to proliferate a normal.dot template with these three fonts as the defaults. Updating http://www.redhat.com/promo/fonts/ ASAP would be ideal. I have attached a Zip file with these fonts as well as the same License.txt as the original release (given the format differences from the one including in RPMS).
Comment 22 Bryan J Smith 2008-02-17 12:47:00 EST
I would also make a further suggestion. If we are truly trying to proliferate the usage of these fonts, we should consider including a "normal.dot" template that ... - Uses these fonts by default (with any required style changes) - Includes instructions on how to install the normal.dot - Is created as a DOC 8.0 (97) format file for maximum version compatibility If this would be in a separate, additional Zip file, I should probably file a new Bugzilla request. Let me know if that is the case and if I should open one.