Bug 427791

Summary: Liberation fonts need to be updated to latest font
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: Richard Monk <rmonk>
Component: liberation-fontsAssignee: Caius Chance <me>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 5.1CC: eng-i18n-bugs, fonts-bugs, petersen
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: i18n
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: RHBA-2008-0071 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-02-06 13:59:56 EST Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 430240, 431218    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Latest liberation fonts from Ascender
none
liberation-fonts-1.0-1.zip [ Liberation Fonts from EL5 source, 2007-Dec release with hinting ] none

Description Richard Monk 2008-01-07 11:22:33 EST
The final results for the Liberation fonts are attached to this bug.  These are
from Brian Kraimer at Ascender: brian.kraimer@ascendercorp.com
Comment 1 Richard Monk 2008-01-07 11:22:33 EST
Created attachment 290976 [details]
Latest liberation fonts from Ascender
Comment 2 Caius Chance 2008-01-09 01:36:22 EST
File seems corrupted?
Comment 3 Jens Petersen 2008-01-09 23:32:15 EST
Fixed by changing mime-type to application/octet-stream.
Comment 9 Nicolas Mailhot 2008-01-13 04:56:50 EST
Please also update the Fedora packages (if you need some testing for example)
Comment 10 Caius Chance 2008-01-13 18:31:55 EST
(In reply to comment #9)
> Please also update the Fedora packages (if you need some testing for example)

sure.
Comment 13 RHEL Product and Program Management 2008-01-15 19:37:39 EST
This bugzilla was reviewed by QE as a non-FasTrack request.
It has since been proposed for FasTrack. The qa_ack has 
been reset. QE needs to re-review this bugzilla for FasTrack.
Comment 19 errata-xmlrpc 2008-02-06 13:59:56 EST
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0071.html
Comment 20 Cody Boisclair 2008-02-17 00:13:41 EST
These also need to be posted on http://www.redhat.com/promo/fonts/ for the benefit of non-RH users.
Comment 21 Bryan J Smith 2008-02-17 12:33:33 EST
Created attachment 295106 [details]
liberation-fonts-1.0-1.zip [ Liberation Fonts from EL5 source, 2007-Dec release with hinting ]

Second Cody Bosisclair (cody@zone38.net).  I (GPS) am at a client site having
to exchange with Windows and the December fonts are infinitely better than the
May release.  I'm doing my best to proliferate a normal.dot template with these
three fonts as the defaults.  Updating http://www.redhat.com/promo/fonts/ ASAP
would be ideal.

I have attached a Zip file with these fonts as well as the same License.txt as
the original release (given the format differences from the one including in
RPMS).
Comment 22 Bryan J Smith 2008-02-17 12:47:00 EST
I would also make a further suggestion.  If we are truly trying to proliferate
the usage of these fonts, we should consider including a "normal.dot" template
that ...
 - Uses these fonts by default (with any required style changes)
 - Includes instructions on how to install the normal.dot
 - Is created as a DOC 8.0 (97) format file for maximum version compatibility

If this would be in a separate, additional Zip file, I should probably file a
new Bugzilla request.  Let me know if that is the case and if I should open one.
Comment 23 Cody Boisclair 2008-02-19 14:23:55 EST
I've created bug 433513 to address the issue of the font files needing to be updated on the Red Hat web 
site.