Bug 427933

Summary:

XMLRPC function getBugFields

Product:

[Community] Bugzilla

Reporter:

Noura El hawary <nelhawar>

Component:

WebService

Assignee:

Noura El hawary <nelhawar>

Status:

CLOSED NEXTRELEASE

QA Contact:

Severity:

medium

Docs Contact:

Priority:

high

Version:

3.2

CC:

dkl

Target Milestone:

---

Keywords:

Reopened

Target Release:

---

Hardware:

All

OS:

Linux

Whiteboard:

Fixed In Version:

Doc Type:

Bug Fix

Doc Text:

Story Points:

---

Clone Of:

Environment:

Last Closed:

2009-02-05 23:21:03 UTC

Type:

---

Regression:

---

Mount Type:

---

Documentation:

---

CRM:

Verified Versions:

Category:

---

oVirt Team:

---

RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:

Cloudforms Team:

---

Target Upstream Version:

Embargoed:

Bug Depends On:

Bug Blocks:

406131, 427053

Attachments:

Description	Flags
v1 for xmlrpc function Bug.get_fields + pod	dkl: review+

Description Noura El hawary 2008-01-08 02:05:14 UTC

write xmlrpc function getBugFields that is to be contributed to the upstream.
Please refer to the following url for details on Bugzilla::RPC 2.18 functions mapped to upstream Bugzilla::WebService and for 2.18 xmlrpc functions sorted by percentage of calls: https://engineering.redhat.com/trac/bugzilla-3.0-rh/wiki/XmlrpcCrossComparison#a2.18xmlrpcfunctionssortedbypercentageofcalls

Comment 1 Noura El hawary 2008-11-27 07:18:06 UTC

This function has already been ported.

Comment 2 Noura El hawary 2008-11-27 07:20:50 UTC

reopening, I guess will need to add it to the 3.2 WebService API if it is needed.

Noura

Comment 3 Noura El hawary 2009-02-04 06:30:09 UTC

Hey Dave, 

I see you have ported the xmlrpc function getBugFields from bz2.18 to bz3.2 extension compat_xmlrpc, do you think we should create this function in the actual WebService API interface say we would have it as Bug.get_fields ?

Noura

Comment 4 David Lawrence 2009-02-04 20:48:56 UTC

(In reply to comment #3)
> Hey Dave, 
> 
> I see you have ported the xmlrpc function getBugFields from bz2.18 to bz3.2
> extension compat_xmlrpc, do you think we should create this function in the
> actual WebService API interface say we would have it as Bug.get_fields ?
> 
> Noura

Yes I think it would be a good idea to convert or duplicate this feature in the 3.2 API. Let me know if you want to take this on or if you need me to look at it.

Thanks
Dave

Comment 5 Noura El hawary 2009-02-05 03:54:03 UTC

hey Dave, it should be fine i can this one :).

Thanks,
Noura

Comment 6 Noura El hawary 2009-02-05 09:30:27 UTC

Created attachment 330975 [details]
v1 for xmlrpc function Bug.get_fields + pod

attached a patch for new xmlrpc functions called Bug.get_fields it besically does the same as the current webservice extension function bugzilla.getBugFields, i have removed the group checking for the custom fields as all that is done in Bugzilla->get_fields() in the filter_custom_fields hook. 

Noura

Comment 7 David Lawrence 2009-02-05 22:21:42 UTC

Comment on attachment 330975 [details]
v1 for xmlrpc function Bug.get_fields + pod

Looks good Noura. Works too.

Dave

Comment 8 Noura El hawary 2009-02-05 23:21:03 UTC

Thanks for the review Dave, committed to cvs.

Noura