Bug 429496 (stun-review)

Summary: Review Request: stun - Implements the stun protocol
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala <huzaifas>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Marek Mahut <mmahut>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: fedora-package-review, itamar, lemenkov, notting
Target Milestone: ---Flags: mmahut: fedora-review+
huzaifas: fedora-cvs+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-12-26 07:00:02 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-01-21 05:33:51 UTC
Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~huzaifas/spec/stun.spec
SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~huzaifas/srpms/stun-0.96-0.fc8.src.rpm
Description: Implements a simple STUN server and client on Windows, Linux, and Solaris. The STUN protocol (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) is described in the IETF RFC 3489, available at http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3489.txt

Comment 1 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-01-21 05:51:17 UTC
Added correct macros to the spec.
Awaiting upstream to identify the correct license under which the code is released.

Comment 2 Parag AN(पराग) 2008-03-07 13:22:49 UTC
removing myself from review.
Package is not building for all archs.

Comment 3 Marek Mahut 2008-03-28 19:47:16 UTC
Hey Huzaifa!

- I don't like much download_name macro, I would use something like %{name}d and
_%{version}__Aug13.tgz, but it's up to you :)

- I would also separate -server to a subpackage

- Use -p and -m with install

- Change the license to Vovida Software License 1.0 (btw, this is Fedora/FSF
compatible)

- Does not build with gcc 4.3, you will have to patch it
(http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=536657)

Comment 5 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-04-14 06:11:36 UTC
ping

Comment 6 Marek Mahut 2008-04-23 09:26:43 UTC
I see only minor issues:

 * please rename the patch to stun-0.96-whatthepatchdoes.patch
 * use -p at install to preserve the timestemps
 * the server package does not contain the RFC file

after these minor issues are fixed, this package is approved.

Comment 7 Peter Lemenkov 2008-07-03 18:28:48 UTC
Typo. Fields %description for main package and server-subpackage are equal.

Comment 8 Peter Lemenkov 2008-09-29 06:06:30 UTC
Ping.
So this package is approved long time ago, then where is cvs-request?

Comment 9 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-09-29 06:13:48 UTC
New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: stun
Short Description: Implements the stun protocol
Owners: huzaifas
Branches: F-9 EL-5

Comment 10 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-09-30 04:32:57 UTC
cvs done

Comment 11 Peter Lemenkov 2008-12-09 14:34:21 UTC
Why this package still not imported and built? Seems that someone forget about something :)

Comment 12 Marek Mahut 2008-12-19 20:44:22 UTC
Huzaifa, ping!

Comment 13 Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-12-19 23:43:24 UTC
Can I co-maintain it ?

Comment 14 Fedora Update System 2008-12-24 19:56:24 UTC
stun-0.96-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/stun-0.96-2.fc10

Comment 15 Fedora Update System 2008-12-24 19:57:28 UTC
stun-0.96-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/stun-0.96-2.fc9

Comment 16 Fedora Update System 2008-12-30 23:40:56 UTC
stun-0.96-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 17 Fedora Update System 2008-12-30 23:43:04 UTC
stun-0.96-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.