Bug 429508
Summary: | update vym | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Marek Mahut <mmahut> | ||||||
Component: | vym | Assignee: | Gwyn Ciesla <gwync> | ||||||
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||||
Version: | el5 | CC: | lkundrak | ||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||
Last Closed: | 2008-02-18 21:38:49 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
Embargoed: | |||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Marek Mahut
2008-01-21 08:36:09 UTC
If RHEL-5 has QT4, then yes. Does it? (In reply to comment #1) > If RHEL-5 has QT4, then yes. Does it? Ooops. Sorry I missed your reply from bugzilla. I belive it does, information from RHN: Package: qt4-devel-4.2.1-1.i386 Channel: Red Hat Enterprise Linux (v. 5 for 32-bit x86) Imported, build failed on ppc: /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.67513: line 28: qmake-qt4: command not found Full logs: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-5-epel/38086-vym-1.10.0-1.el5/ ExcludeArch? Hm, looks like it has different name and location in el5. [root@mmahut ~]# rpm -ql qt4-devel | grep make /usr/lib/qt4/bin/qmake ... [root@mmahut ~]# Tried that just now. + qmake DOCDIR=/usr/share/doc/vym-1.10.0 PREFIX=/usr /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.98574: line 28: qmake: command not found error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.98574 (%build) Path issue? Might I have to do /usr/lib/qt4/bin/qmake instead of qmake? Yop, use full patch or add /usr/lib/qt4/bin/ to PATH. On RHEL5: [root@mmahut ~]# /usr/lib/qt4/bin/qmake --version QMake version 2.01a Using Qt version 4.2.1 in /usr/lib/qt4/lib [root@mmahut ~]# rpm -qf /usr/lib/qt4/bin/qmake qt4-devel-4.2.1-1 [root@mmahut ~]# whereis qmake qmake: [root@mmahut ~]# Using full path failed. Might it not be picking up the qt4 libs either? ui_branchpropwindow.h:239: error: 'class QHBoxLayout' has no member named 'setBottomMargin' make: *** [branchobj.o] Error 1 ui_historywindow.h: In member function 'void Ui_HistoryWindow::setupUi(QDialog*)': ui_historywindow.h:42: error: 'class QGridLayout' has no member named 'setLeftMargin' ui_historywindow.h:43: error: 'class QGridLayout' has no member named 'setTopMargin' ui_historywindow.h:44: error: 'class QGridLayout' has no member named 'setRightMargin' ui_historywindow.h:45: error: 'class QGridLayout' has no member named 'setBottomMargin' ui_historywindow.h:46: error: 'class QGridLayout' has no member named 'setHorizontalSpacing' ui_historywindow.h:47: error: 'class QGridLayout' has no member named 'setVerticalSpacing' ui_historywindow.h:74: error: 'class QHBoxLayout' has no member named 'setLeftMargin' ui_historywindow.h:75: error: 'class QHBoxLayout' has no member named 'setTopMargin' ui_historywindow.h:76: error: 'class QHBoxLayout' has no member named 'setRightMargin' ui_historywindow.h:77: error: 'class QHBoxLayout' has no member named 'setBottomMargin' make: *** [exports.o] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.492 (%build) Hm, yes maybe. I'm not sure. Please try to ask epel or devel-list. Did you find the issue yet? Or it isn't a problem with qt4 libs path? Created attachment 294497 [details]
spec file from opensuse
for inspiration
Created attachment 295196 [details]
Fix for vym build in RHEL-5
This worked for me.
May I ask what's the reasoning behind not having cvsextras commits enabled?
Made spec changes, added patch, build died. Patch formatting issue? http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-5-epel/38374-vym-1.10.0-1.el5.1/ppc/build.log cvsextras now open. Sorry for the oversight. Jon: Built fine this time. The patch, hmm... either of us was smoking something bad :) Nevertheless, thanks for extras commits! Wow, I'd say. Thanks for the assistance. :) |