Bug 429512
Summary: | network initscript is not able to create bridge | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Adam Tkac <atkac> | ||||||
Component: | initscripts | Assignee: | Bill Nottingham <notting> | ||||||
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||||
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |||||||
Priority: | low | ||||||||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | ovasik, rvokal | ||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||
Last Closed: | 2008-02-18 09:54:58 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
Embargoed: | |||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Adam Tkac
2008-01-21 09:19:05 UTC
Created attachment 292345 [details]
ifcfg-eth0 configuration file
Created attachment 292346 [details]
ifcfg-peth0
Interesting. There's nothing obvious in the changelog that would affect that. There's changes between 8.60 and 8.61 in both ifup-eth and ifdown-eth ; does reverting either (or both) of these solve it? This is pretty interesting problem. I've installed 8.61 and rebooted. Message "Device peth0 does not seem to be present, delaying initialization." was printed and network wasn't started. When I use ifup-eth from 8.60 (all other was from 8.61) network is started as expected. But when I downgraded to 8.60 and update to 8.61 problem is not reproducable!. All steps written above was done without reboot. When you reboot now you will see problem again. I'm not sure what's going on Is known any workaround with initscripts >= 8.61-1? What is correct way to setup bridge with newest initscripts? Hm, a test bridge worked for me fine. Is the ethernet device actually named peth0 beforehand? (In reply to comment #7) > Hm, a test bridge worked for me fine. Is the ethernet device actually named > peth0 beforehand? Device was named eth0 so this was main problem. I'm not sure why such broken configuration worked long time ago and now it causes problems. I fixed my configuration and now it works as expected. Thanks for your hint, closing |