Bug 437549

Summary:	Multi Org Satellite Admin role granting process is confusing
Product:	Red Hat Satellite 5	Reporter:	Partha Aji <paji>
Component:	Usability	Assignee:	Máirín Duffy <duffy>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Brandon Perkins <bperkins>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	520	CC:	cperry
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
URL:	https://<host>/rhn/admin/multiorg/Users.do
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2008-09-18 18:51:38 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Partha Aji 2008-03-14 20:39:02 UTC

Description of problem:
The process needed to granting any user the "Satellite Admin" role through
https://<host>/rhn/admin/multiorg/Users.do page is not at all clear. The circle
and tick mark images seem to be current status indicators as opposed items you
can take action on by clicking.. The lack of tips on where to click make things
worse on this page.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 5.1


How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Login to satellite as a satellite admin.
2. Click on Satellite Tools- > Users

Actual results:
Notice a list of users is presented with images under "Org Admin?" and
"Satellite Admin?" columns. It is not at all apparent that these images are
clickable to enable or disable satellite admin role... They seem to only
indicate the current status.
 

Expected results:

Would prefer a better design.. May be tips directing one to click on the images
to enable/disable satadmin status.. May be check boxes instead of images to show
that these items are selectable...  Would even prefer things like a simple text
link to stating "Click Here to Enable"

Additional info:

Comment 2 Clifford Perry 2008-09-18 18:51:38 UTC

I think the page design we have right now works well. I do not agree we should re-visit this page in Satellite 5.3.0 time frame. 

Cliff