Bug 437797
Summary: | Spell checking does not work | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal <sindrepb> |
Component: | libsexy | Assignee: | Brian Pepple <bdpepple> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | rawhide | Keywords: | Reopened |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | 0.1.11-6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-03-26 01:11:02 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal
2008-03-17 14:24:56 UTC
Confirmed that spell-checking is broken, but I'm not 100% sure it's a bug in xchat-gnome. Looking into this very briefly, I'm thinking it's due to the recent changes in enchant, but I need to verify that. Regardless, this is a pretty low priority right now, and I probably won't have a chance to look into this until after F9 has hit the streets. ok, this bug should be filed against libsexy. the aspell backend for enchant was split out from the main enchant package in January, and libsexy only requires enchant. So to fix this, libsexy needs to be update to require enchant-aspell. Hmm, are you *sure* that you need to require enchant-aspell and not just enchant ? i.e. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureDictionary where enchant by default uses hunspell as the default backend, and the default GNOME and KDE spellcheckers are using just hunspell via enchant and OOo & firefox use enchant directly. I have xchat-2.8.4-14.fc9.i386 installed here, and no aspell and my spell checking (english) works out of the box with xchat + enchant and no aspell + hunspell-en. Perhaps you want to ensure that e.g. the english dictionaries for hunspell are required ? e.g. hunspell-en +1 to Caolan's comment, enchant-aspell is entirely the wrong thing to require, we don't want dependencies on aspell, hunspell should be used instead! |