Bug 441076

Summary:	sugar: useless debuginfo package, should be noarch?
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta>
Component:	sugar	Assignee:	Simon Schampijer <simon>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	rawhide	CC:	johnp, sebastian, tomeu
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2009-12-07 20:00:51 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Ville Skyttä 2008-04-05 21:23:48 UTC

sugar-debuginfo is useless, it contains no files.  A fix would be either making
the sugar package noarch (it doesn't seem to contain anything architecture
dependent) or explicitly disabling the debuginfo package if noarch is not possible.

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Debuginfo

Comment 1 Bug Zapper 2008-05-14 08:57:28 UTC

Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA.
More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 2 Ville Skyttä 2009-01-30 22:22:42 UTC

Ping?  sugar-debuginfo-0.83.5-2.fc11.x86_64 in Rawhide is still empty.

Comment 4 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2009-04-06 20:39:51 UTC

This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

Comment 5 Bug Zapper 2009-06-09 09:31:33 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 11 development cycle.
Changing version to '11'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 6 Ville Skyttä 2009-11-22 19:33:01 UTC

Ping #2?  It's been 1,5 years and sugar-debuginfo-0.86.3-5.fc13.x86_64 in Rawhide is still empty.

Comment 7 Sebastian Dziallas 2009-12-07 20:00:51 UTC

I've fixed this in Rawhide with the Sugar 0.87.1 update.

Comment 8 Simon Schampijer 2009-12-08 08:34:55 UTC

Thaks Sebastian for taking care of this!