Bug 441076 - sugar: useless debuginfo package, should be noarch?
Summary: sugar: useless debuginfo package, should be noarch?
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: sugar
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Simon Schampijer
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-04-05 21:23 UTC by Ville Skyttä
Modified: 2009-12-08 08:34 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-12-07 20:00:51 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Ville Skyttä 2008-04-05 21:23:48 UTC
sugar-debuginfo is useless, it contains no files.  A fix would be either making
the sugar package noarch (it doesn't seem to contain anything architecture
dependent) or explicitly disabling the debuginfo package if noarch is not possible.

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Debuginfo

Comment 1 Bug Zapper 2008-05-14 08:57:28 UTC
Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA.
More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 2 Ville Skyttä 2009-01-30 22:22:42 UTC
Ping?  sugar-debuginfo-0.83.5-2.fc11.x86_64 in Rawhide is still empty.

Comment 4 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2009-04-06 20:39:51 UTC
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

Comment 5 Bug Zapper 2009-06-09 09:31:33 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 11 development cycle.
Changing version to '11'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 6 Ville Skyttä 2009-11-22 19:33:01 UTC
Ping #2?  It's been 1,5 years and sugar-debuginfo-0.86.3-5.fc13.x86_64 in Rawhide is still empty.

Comment 7 Sebastian Dziallas 2009-12-07 20:00:51 UTC
I've fixed this in Rawhide with the Sugar 0.87.1 update.

Comment 8 Simon Schampijer 2009-12-08 08:34:55 UTC
Thaks Sebastian for taking care of this!


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.