Bug 441382

Summary:	Fedora does not start up
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Angelo Borsotti <angelo.borsotti>
Component:	kernel	Assignee:	John W. Linville <linville>
Status:	CLOSED CANTFIX	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	urgent	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	8	CC:	kernel-maint
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	i686
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2008-08-19 18:43:49 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Angelo Borsotti 2008-04-07 19:50:40 UTC

Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. switch on the computer
2. wait
3.
  
Actual results:

Grub bootstraps Fedora. A console window appears, in which the notification
of the starting of some components appears.
After that, the following is displayed:

SIOCSIFFLAGS: operations not supported
./ifup-wireless line 60:
  1945 Segmentation fault

Then the computer enters a state in which NOTHING can be done, except
power it off. There is no way to terminate the startup sequence and
bring up Fedora. P.S. Ubuntu boots successfully.

Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Jeremy Katz 2008-04-08 03:42:03 UTC

Are the keyboard LEDs flashing at this point?

Comment 2 John W. Linville 2008-04-17 15:09:27 UTC

What kernel are you using?  What is your wireless hardware?

Comment 3 Angelo Borsotti 2008-04-17 22:41:53 UTC

The keyboard LEDs are not flashing.
The kernel is the one of Fedora 8.
The wireless hardware is a PCI Atgheros board, and it works properly with Ubuntu.

Comment 4 John W. Linville 2008-04-18 12:22:31 UTC

Could you be a bit more specific about which kernel you are using?  There are 
dozens of Fedora 8 kernels.  Please post the output of 'uname -r'...thanks!

Comment 5 John W. Linville 2008-08-19 18:43:49 UTC

Closed due to lack of response...