Bug 441513

Summary:	gnome-packagekit hangs UI hangs when it needs to import gpg signatures
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Thomas J. Baker <tjb>
Component:	gnome-packagekit	Assignee:	Robin Norwood <robin.norwood>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	rawhide
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2008-04-19 12:30:18 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	441857

Description Thomas J. Baker 2008-04-08 15:05:51 UTC

I thought I saw this talked about somewhere but I can't find a bug for it.

If I install the livna release rpm and then try to install something from it
using packagekit, it hangs with the status bar displaying "Checking signatures".
It's hung somewhere relating to importing/accepting the livna signature. If I
install something from livna first using yum in a terminal and accept the
signature, then packagekit installs after that are fine.

I'm using 

yum-packagekit-0.1.11-1.fc9.x86_64
gnome-packagekit-0.1.11-1.fc9.x86_64
PackageKit-0.1.11-1.fc9.x86_64
PackageKit-libs-0.1.11-1.fc9.x86_64

Comment 1 Thomas J. Baker 2008-04-18 17:53:46 UTC

I just reinstalled the preview, added the livna repos, and had the same problem.
The app installed would just hang and there was no way to get any information on
what was going on. I then installed a single livna package by hand and it
prompted me for the gpg key acceptance and I remembered this bug.

I'm using these:

PackageKit-0.1.12-4.20080416git.fc9.x86_64
yum-packagekit-0.1.12-4.20080416git.fc9.x86_64
gnome-packagekit-0.1.12-5.20080416git.fc9.x86_64
jpackage-utils-1.7.5-1jpp.1.fc9.noarch
PackageKit-libs-0.1.12-4.20080416git.fc9.x86_64

I would consider this a blocker given the opaqueness of what the problem is and
how friendly the app installed is supposed to be.

Comment 2 Thomas J. Baker 2008-04-18 20:07:23 UTC

This bug is probably the same as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440156.

Comment 3 Richard Hughes 2008-04-19 12:30:18 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 440156 ***