Bug 441537
| Summary: | kde-l10n currently has docs disabled | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Kevin Kofler <kevin> |
| Component: | kde-l10n | Assignee: | Kevin Kofler <kevin> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | kevin, ltinkl, rdieter, than |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2008-04-22 18:04:56 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 235705, 421891 | ||
|
Description
Kevin Kofler
2008-04-08 16:25:45 UTC
Docs build just fine now (kde-l10n-4.0.3-2.fc9), I have to update the file list and fix kde-i18n not to conflict though. it seems many help documents are still missing in kde-l10 upstream, for example LANG=de_DE. the current khelpcenter seems not so usefull What's missing? The German translations for documentation are 96% complete! http://l10n.kde.org/stats/doc/stable-kde4/team/ If you mean kdepim stuff is missing, that's normal, we have kdepim for 3.5, so kdepim translations will still come from the KDE 3 kde-i18n package. (I still have to fix that package to remove the docs which are now provided by kde-l10n.) This should be fixed in: kde-l10n-4.0.3-4.fc9 kde-i18n-3.5.9-5.fc9 Documentation for KDE 4 apps now comes from kde-l10n. There should be no file conflicts (assuming you upgrade both kde-l10n and kde-i18n), it would be nice if somebody could verify this for all languages. I'd also like to know what documentation, if any is missing. (Than, you said in comment #2 that there's lots of stuff missing, what exactly? If it's really a lot of stuff missing, pointing to at least one shouldn't be hard. ;-) ) The more QA we can get on this before pushing this to F9, the better. Than: Is the issue you alluded to in comment #2 actually bug 443016 (which would mean the package is actually good to go, assuming no conflicts)? Kevin, please ignore my comments #2, it's a bug 443016 that i already fixed. We have to make sure that there're no file conflicts with new kde-l10n/kde-i18n. It's fine with me to have it in F9-final, assuming no conflicts ;-) Sebastian says there appear to be no conflicts. Requesting f9-final tagging. Those packages are in F9-final now. Closing. |