Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||kde-l10n currently has docs disabled|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Kevin Kofler <kevin>|
|Component:||kde-l10n||Assignee:||Kevin Kofler <kevin>|
|Status:||CLOSED RAWHIDE||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Version:||rawhide||CC:||kevin, ltinkl, rdieter, than|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2008-04-22 14:04:56 EDT||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Bug Depends On:|
|Bug Blocks:||235705, 421891|
Description Kevin Kofler 2008-04-08 12:25:45 EDT
Description of problem: We currently have -D BUILD_docs:BOOL=OFF in kde-l10n because the docs didn't build. We have to check if this is fixed, and if not, fix it. Once this is done, we have to remove the conflicting docs from the KDE 3 kde-i18n. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): kde-l10n-4.0.1-3.fc9
Comment 1 Kevin Kofler 2008-04-17 01:23:53 EDT
Docs build just fine now (kde-l10n-4.0.3-2.fc9), I have to update the file list and fix kde-i18n not to conflict though.
Comment 2 Ngo Than 2008-04-17 06:00:00 EDT
it seems many help documents are still missing in kde-l10 upstream, for example LANG=de_DE. the current khelpcenter seems not so usefull
Comment 3 Kevin Kofler 2008-04-17 15:48:55 EDT
What's missing? The German translations for documentation are 96% complete! http://l10n.kde.org/stats/doc/stable-kde4/team/ If you mean kdepim stuff is missing, that's normal, we have kdepim for 3.5, so kdepim translations will still come from the KDE 3 kde-i18n package. (I still have to fix that package to remove the docs which are now provided by kde-l10n.)
Comment 4 Kevin Kofler 2008-04-18 00:35:15 EDT
This should be fixed in: kde-l10n-4.0.3-4.fc9 kde-i18n-3.5.9-5.fc9 Documentation for KDE 4 apps now comes from kde-l10n. There should be no file conflicts (assuming you upgrade both kde-l10n and kde-i18n), it would be nice if somebody could verify this for all languages. I'd also like to know what documentation, if any is missing. (Than, you said in comment #2 that there's lots of stuff missing, what exactly? If it's really a lot of stuff missing, pointing to at least one shouldn't be hard. ;-) ) The more QA we can get on this before pushing this to F9, the better.
Comment 5 Kevin Kofler 2008-04-18 13:07:49 EDT
Than: Is the issue you alluded to in comment #2 actually bug 443016 (which would mean the package is actually good to go, assuming no conflicts)?
Comment 6 Ngo Than 2008-04-18 13:29:08 EDT
Kevin, please ignore my comments #2, it's a bug 443016 that i already fixed. We have to make sure that there're no file conflicts with new kde-l10n/kde-i18n. It's fine with me to have it in F9-final, assuming no conflicts ;-)
Comment 7 Kevin Kofler 2008-04-18 18:27:06 EDT
Sebastian says there appear to be no conflicts. Requesting f9-final tagging.
Comment 8 Bill Nottingham 2008-04-22 14:04:56 EDT
Those packages are in F9-final now. Closing.