Bug 441537

Summary: kde-l10n currently has docs disabled
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Kevin Kofler <kevin>
Component: kde-l10nAssignee: Kevin Kofler <kevin>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: kevin, ltinkl, rdieter, than
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-04-22 14:04:56 EDT Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 235705, 421891    

Description Kevin Kofler 2008-04-08 12:25:45 EDT
Description of problem:
We currently have -D BUILD_docs:BOOL=OFF in kde-l10n because the docs didn't 
build. We have to check if this is fixed, and if not, fix it. Once this is 
done, we have to remove the conflicting docs from the KDE 3 kde-i18n.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Comment 1 Kevin Kofler 2008-04-17 01:23:53 EDT
Docs build just fine now (kde-l10n-4.0.3-2.fc9), I have to update the file list 
and fix kde-i18n not to conflict though.
Comment 2 Ngo Than 2008-04-17 06:00:00 EDT
it seems many help documents are still missing in kde-l10 upstream, for 
example LANG=de_DE. the current khelpcenter seems not so usefull
Comment 3 Kevin Kofler 2008-04-17 15:48:55 EDT
What's missing? The German translations for documentation are 96% complete!

If you mean kdepim stuff is missing, that's normal, we have kdepim for 3.5, so 
kdepim translations will still come from the KDE 3 kde-i18n package. (I still 
have to fix that package to remove the docs which are now provided by 
Comment 4 Kevin Kofler 2008-04-18 00:35:15 EDT
This should be fixed in:
Documentation for KDE 4 apps now comes from kde-l10n. There should be no file 
conflicts (assuming you upgrade both kde-l10n and kde-i18n), it would be nice 
if somebody could verify this for all languages.

I'd also like to know what documentation, if any is missing. (Than, you said in 
comment #2 that there's lots of stuff missing, what exactly? If it's really a 
lot of stuff missing, pointing to at least one shouldn't be hard. ;-) )

The more QA we can get on this before pushing this to F9, the better.
Comment 5 Kevin Kofler 2008-04-18 13:07:49 EDT
Than: Is the issue you alluded to in comment #2 actually bug 443016 (which 
would mean the package is actually good to go, assuming no conflicts)?
Comment 6 Ngo Than 2008-04-18 13:29:08 EDT
Kevin, please ignore my comments #2, it's a bug 443016 that i already fixed.

We have to make sure that there're no file conflicts with new 
kde-l10n/kde-i18n. It's fine with me to have it in F9-final, assuming no 
conflicts ;-)
Comment 7 Kevin Kofler 2008-04-18 18:27:06 EDT
Sebastian says there appear to be no conflicts. Requesting f9-final tagging.
Comment 8 Bill Nottingham 2008-04-22 14:04:56 EDT
Those packages are in F9-final now. Closing.