Bug 442487

Summary:	Fedora 9 needs a Waves screensaver lock theme
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Paul W. Frields <stickster>
Component:	fedorainfinity-screensaver-theme	Assignee:	Ray Strode [halfline] <rstrode>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	9	CC:	davidz, jfrieben
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2009-04-13 15:13:50 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	235705

Description Paul W. Frields 2008-04-15 02:58:24 UTC

I've put a quick one together based on the Infinity lock dialog, at:

http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/packages/tarballs/fedorawaves-screensaver-theme-1.0.0.tar.bz2

I made the top padding in the overall GtkContainer widget a little larger so
that the circular "waves" motif shows up better.

Comment 1 Ian Weller 2008-04-15 03:26:43 UTC

The one thing that I've had against not using the Fedora logo in the lock screen
dialog is because all the previous ones seemed to have some sort of Fedora logo.
(Maybe I'm mistaken.)

However, what you stated at
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-art-list/2008-April/msg00314.html holds true.

I'm not exactly sure I like this particular wallpaper being used for the dialog,
but it's still pretty good. +1

Comment 2 Joachim Frieben 2008-04-15 14:22:49 UTC

Huh? The F8 one clearly hasn't.

Comment 3 Paul W. Frields 2008-05-04 00:50:37 UTC

Bump.  Are we going to get this in F9?

Comment 4 Ray Strode [halfline] 2008-05-04 15:15:18 UTC

This fell off my radar :-(

I'll have to push it as an F9 update.

Comment 5 Bug Zapper 2008-05-14 09:27:21 UTC

Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA.
More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 6 Paul W. Frields 2008-07-18 00:15:17 UTC

Ping?  If you say this is a no-go, I can take it. :-)

Comment 7 Ray Strode [halfline] 2008-07-28 19:42:55 UTC

it's not a no-go, just a low-on-the-priority-scale-go.  Let me write it on my
whiteboard to see if that makes it happen faster :-)

Sorry for the slow turn around on this one

Comment 8 Ray Strode [halfline] 2008-07-28 19:43:36 UTC

shoot. it's already on my whiteboard

Comment 9 Ray Strode [halfline] 2009-04-13 15:13:50 UTC

I totally dropped the ball on this one and there really isn't much point in picking the ball back up at this point.

I'm going to go ahead and close this one out.  Sorry, Paul, for wasting your time and effort on this one.