Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||fedora 9 or rawhide should match LSB 3.2|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Mats Wichmann <mats>|
|Component:||redhat-lsb||Assignee:||Hao Liu <hliu>|
|Status:||CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Fixed In Version:||redhat-lsb3.2-2||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2009-04-24 02:20:40 EDT||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Bug Depends On:|
Description Mats Wichmann 2008-04-16 17:23:13 EDT
redhat-lsb should provide the deps for LSB 3.2, it works for LSB 3.2 at least as well as earlier Fedora versions did for 3.1 (this is not the same as asking for Fedora to be certified!). I have an updated copy available that has made the appropriate database queries matching LSB 3.2 requirements - can build a package from this that seems to work fine.
Comment 1 Mats Wichmann 2008-04-29 16:59:41 EDT
Created attachment 304156 [details] patch to update redhat-lsb (expanded) tarball Since there's been no uptake, I'm attaching a patch. Note this is not a patch-to-add-to-the-package, but rather one to bring forward the expanded tarball to a new version. This package is a little odd since it does work to extract data from a local copy of the LSB database and uses that to build a new specfile, it means we have to start the modifications "at the top" as it were. Anyway - this works for me and should be a good starting point. I'm successfully using the resulting package on f9.
Comment 2 Bug Zapper 2008-05-14 05:33:06 EDT
Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Comment 3 Lawrence Lim 2008-05-30 01:33:25 EDT
Sorry for the delay Mats. I will Liu Hao helping me including the patch into the package.
Comment 4 Hao Liu 2008-08-28 02:31:48 EDT
Fixed in the redhat-lsb3.2-2