|
Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | new version available | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Patrice Dumas <pertusus> |
| Component: | a2ps | Assignee: | Tim Waugh <twaugh> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 9 | CC: | 965a487 |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | 4.14-5.fc9 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2008-06-11 00:38:16 EDT | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | ||
| Bug Depends On: | 443177 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 235705 | ||
|
Description
Patrice Dumas
2008-04-17 16:21:53 EDT
I'll be looking at it over the week-end. Great! Sorry, haven't got round to it myself yet. Also you didn't grant nor denied my fedora package database asks. I guess You missed it. Also I am submitting html2ps, I think it would be better to use it as I said in the review. I have something ready. I haven't rebased the flex patch and I removed the flex commands, since it doesn't seems to be very useful and is a departure from upstream which is not really needed in my opinion. I also haven't rerbased the netscape patch since it doesn't work with firefox nor seamonkey. So I make this depend on the html2ps review. Does this seem right? Ok, I have committed in cvs. I have put a2ps-4.13-eucjp.patch in cvs since the big chunk (the translation) seems to be included now. I haven't built since it is waiting on html2ps. This leaves you the opportunity to check what I did. - update to 4.14 - don't obsolete the provided version of a2ps-i18n - use html2ps for the html delegation A side note is that upstream fix for a2ps-shell.patch is very different (but looks good too). So far I have only uncommented the patches, I'll clean after some time in rawhide without issues (including cvs rm). The following patches are not needed anymore: a2ps-generate-tarball.sh a2ps-4.13-flex.patch a2ps-4.13-varargs.patch a2ps-tmpdir.patch a2ps-4.13-bison.patch a2ps-4.13-malloc.patch a2ps-shell.patch a2ps-includes.patch a2ps-underquoted.patch a2ps-netscape.patch a2ps-psset.patch It is built in devel. Should I build it for other branches too? Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Let's see how it gets on in devel. Perhaps we can do updates for released versions if there are no problems. Thanks for your work on this, and sorry for the slow response. I have --><-- this much time to work on a2ps at the moment.. :-/ a2ps-4.14-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update a2ps'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-4782 a2ps-4.14-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |