Bug 443375
Summary: | Review Request: python-openhpi - Python interface for OpenHPI | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Dan Horák <dan> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Richard W.M. Jones <rjones> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, notting |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | rjones:
fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-04-28 10:42:01 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Dan Horák
2008-04-21 08:58:45 UTC
scratch build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=577485 + rpmlint output no output ? package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines I'm dubious about naming the package 'py-openhpi' even though strictly speaking this doesn't violate any Python guideline. I would rename it python-openhpi instead just for consistency with other Python packages in Fedora. + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora + license matches the actual package license + %doc includes license file + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm + package successfully builds on at least one architecture i386 n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun n/a does not use Prefix: /usr + package owns all directories it creates + no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package n/a header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static n/a packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base n/a packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available - reviewer should build the package in mock (but ok coz built in koji) + the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures - review should test the package functions as described n/a scriptlets should be sane n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel n/a shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin =============== APPROVED However please consider renaming the package to python-openhpi. The package name was a question for me too. So I will rename it and when somebody will require the upstream name, it can be easily added as Provides. Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-openhpi Short Description: Python interface for OpenHPI Owners: sharkcz Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes cvs done. imported and built in devel Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-openhpi New Branches: EL-5 cvs done. |