Bug 443924
Summary: | scipy for epel | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Marek Mahut <mmahut> |
Component: | scipy | Assignee: | Jef Spaleta <jspaleta> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 9 | Flags: | j:
fedora-cvs+
|
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-07-14 15:38:25 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 443921 |
Description
Marek Mahut
2008-04-24 06:20:39 UTC
Short answer... yes. Long answer... Until I have an EPEL machine that I have access to locally associated with my day job, I am not going to maintain any EPEL packages. I'll happily let another Fedora contributor maintain scipy as part of EPEL. There is no requirement that the maintainer for the Fedora branches must be the person who maintains the EPEL branch of the same package. Hopeful answer... I just got a new data server which I will be installing CentOS onto for my dayjob. Once this is up and running I then have a compelling reason to take on the responsibility of maintaining scipy for EPEL... if someone else doesn't beat me too it. -jef Jef, ok. As I need this package to satisfy my dependencies, I propose you that I'll take ownership of this package for time being and after you get comfortable we can hand-over you the ownership/co-maintaining. Is that ok for you? I've got me local centos box up and running. Let me make the EPEL branch. Do you have a specific Fedora you want the EPEL branch to be filled with initially? -jef Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: scipy New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Updated EPEL Owners: jspaleta,mmahut CVS done. Marek, scipy for EL-5 has been built and should be on its way to the EL-5 testing repository. I'm working on EL-4 now. We need to start thinking hard about organizing scientific computing software via a SIG. -jef Thank you. I'm working with my Astronomy SIG and trying to get this software as well for EL-5 users. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Astronomy Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Fedora 9 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-07-10. Fedora 9 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. |