Bug 444566
| Summary: | Feature regression with gnumeric 1.8.2 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Pat Gunn <pgunn> | ||||
| Component: | gnumeric | Assignee: | Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala <huzaifas> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED UPSTREAM | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | low | ||||||
| Version: | 9 | CC: | huzaifas, lex.lists | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | All | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2009-02-26 22:39:22 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Pat Gunn
2008-04-29 07:01:52 UTC
Created attachment 304074 [details]
Spreadsheet which works in older versions of gnumeric
I can reproduce this. Looks like this is no longer supported, you need to use SUM(A4:A6)/B4/B9 instead I am going to probe a little more tomorrow. I would like to request then that Fedora9 consider inclusion 1.6 of gnumeric then instead of 1.8. Breaking of people's existing spreadsheets is not a good thing in an upgrade. Working with the developers, we found that forcing array evaluation (control-shift-enter) on all cells that previously worked using standard evaluation results in spreadsheets working again. They are considering adding an internal flag for spreadsheets enabling old-style evaluation though. Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Pat, was is this resolved for you now? It's upstream at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=530711 I'll poke them. |