Bug 444821
| Summary: | unaligned access messages during kickstart install | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Bryan Stillwell <stillwell> | ||||||||
| Component: | libnl | Assignee: | Doug Chapman <dchapman> | ||||||||
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||||||
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |||||||||
| Priority: | low | ||||||||||
| Version: | 9 | CC: | dcbw, fedora-ia64-committee, tgraf | ||||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||||||
| Hardware: | ia64 | ||||||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2009-01-27 15:51:25 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||
|
Description
Bryan Stillwell
2008-04-30 20:04:43 UTC
Created attachment 304270 [details]
kickstart script used to install on /dev/sda
Created attachment 304271 [details]
First 5 unaligned access messages
Created attachment 304272 [details]
Second 5 unaligned access messages
My assumption this is the same libnl issue that we recently fixed in RHEL 5.2. I will investigate but for now moving to libnl. Package revisions: anaconda-11.4.0.75-1 libnl-1.1-3.fc9 Adding dcbw and tgraf to the CC list. This is identical to what we recently fixed in RHEL5.2 (BZ 434826). Do we want to fix this in the same way? I know there were other ideas on how to better fix this however we didn't want to break binary compatibility on RHEL5.X. Perhaps we want to implement that fix in Fedora. The way it was fixed in RHEL5.2 is also the way I fixed this upstream. There is really is no other way unless the kernel enters an unstable cycle again allowing for the netlink protocols to break. Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Closing since we are not currently building Fedora on ia64. Will re-open if this is still seen once builds begin again. |