Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||GPG support needs work|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Bill Nottingham <notting>|
|Component:||gnome-packagekit||Assignee:||Robin Norwood <robin.norwood>|
|Status:||CLOSED RAWHIDE||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Version:||rawhide||CC:||richard, rvokal, wwoods|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2008-05-02 11:43:05 EDT||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Bug Depends On:|
Description Bill Nottingham 2008-04-30 16:46:05 EDT
Description of problem: 1) it shouldn't tell the user to restart the transaction. It should just restart it 2) when triggered from the 'review updates' screen, it hangs the update progress thing, which needs to be manually dismissed 2) If you do right-click->Update System on the icon, the GPG key adder is never triggered (and it isn't at all obvious how you would trigger it if you don't know it's in the 'update review' dialog) Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): PackageKit-0.1.12-8.20080425.fc9 gnome-packagekit-0.1.12-11.20080430.fc9
Comment 1 Richard Hughes 2008-05-01 06:38:48 EDT
1) In master it does - in fact it handles the interaction much better - but the change is very invasive 2) Yup 3) Yes - I could fix this for F9 if you wish, but it'll be the same bodge as the others. Yell if you want me to do it.
Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2008-05-01 09:45:12 EDT
How invasive is invasive? As it's the first release we've shipped with PK, I'm not concerned about the ABI. :) If nothing else, it should probably queue a refresh so it's not waiting for the next scheduled check to tell you that updates are still available. Is #2 fixable as well?
Comment 3 Bill Nottingham 2008-05-01 09:49:32 EDT
Also, for #3, it displays 'The system update has completed', when it hasn't.
Comment 4 Richard Hughes 2008-05-01 19:33:24 EDT
Are we loading the keys (rpm --import /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora*) at firstboot/anaconda now? If so, this bug is very low visibility. Is not, then very high visibility. Jeremy was being a bit vague on irc in the meeting, so I'm not sure what was decided.
Comment 5 Richard Hughes 2008-05-01 19:54:16 EDT
Comment 6 Will Woods 2008-05-02 10:44:41 EDT
Key imports are happening in anaconda for F9, which significantly reduces the visibility of these problems. I think this can therefore be moved from the blockers to F9Target (we'd still like to see fixes ASAP in F9 updates).
Comment 7 Bill Nottingham 2008-05-02 11:26:18 EDT
Moving back for the moment - I consider the built fix a blocking need (as it prevents updates). The other two bits are just potential enhancements.
Comment 8 Bill Nottingham 2008-05-02 11:43:05 EDT
Tested the packages, they fix issue #3. Closing.