Bug 445096
| Summary: | apt Autoupdates w/o user permission | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Suren Karapetyan <suren> |
| Component: | apt | Assignee: | Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm> |
| Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | 10 | CC: | cweyl, pmatilai |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | EasyFix |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2009-01-15 03:11:05 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Suren Karapetyan
2008-05-03 17:24:44 UTC
The real bug there is that the apt service is running by default, it's supposed to be disabled by default and this has always been the case. CHECK_ONLY is only relevant if the apt service is actually enabled. (Maybe a regression caused by the switch from SysVInit to Upstart?) (In reply to comment #1) > The real bug there is that the apt service is running by default, it's supposed > to be disabled by default and this has always been the case. CHECK_ONLY is only > relevant if the apt service is actually enabled. Well.. I mostly agree with You: apt service should be disabled. But even if apt is disabled and a user enables it himself, he/she will probably expect it to behave just like yum-updatesd (i.e. only update the package list - not the packages). So IMO the service should be disabled and CHECK_ONLY should be yes. BTW: /etc/init.d/apt is a really funny script to read :) It's the only thing I've seen which uses touch/rm to control a cron job and emulate a service. I don't say I don't like it (well.. opposite: I do LOVE it) but it really looks like a hack :D Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Ping? Anybody out there? Come on guys... this is EASY. I don't even think there is need for maintainer's permission to do this. apt-0.5.15lorg3.95-0.git416.3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/apt-0.5.15lorg3.95-0.git416.3.fc10 apt-0.5.15lorg3.95-0.git416 (at least partly) fixes this, but it still isn't the expected behaviour. In the old times when we had yum-updatesd it was on by default but it only downloaded package lists (to be able to tell You if there is an update) instead of autoupdating. To get the same result with apt the "CHECK_ONLY=no" should be changed to "CHECK_ONLY=yes" in /etc/sysconfig/apt apt-0.5.15lorg3.95-0.git416.3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update apt'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0304 apt-0.5.15lorg3.95-0.git416.3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |