Bug 445734
Summary: | Documentation needed on booting from a multipath device | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Steven J. Levine <slevine> | ||||||
Component: | doc-DM-Multipath_Guide | Assignee: | Steven J. Levine <slevine> | ||||||
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | ecs-bugs | ||||||
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |||||||
Priority: | high | ||||||||
Version: | 5.3 | CC: | bcl, bmarzins, bmr, bstevens, coughlan, dherrman, dmair, iannis, john, tao | ||||||
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Documentation | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
Clone Of: | |||||||||
: | 746775 (view as bug list) | Environment: | |||||||
Last Closed: | 2013-05-20 20:17:02 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
Embargoed: | |||||||||
Bug Depends On: | |||||||||
Bug Blocks: | 668957, 746775 | ||||||||
Deadline: | 2011-11-08 | ||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Steven J. Levine
2008-05-08 20:06:28 UTC
On August 10 I sent a followup ping to Tom Coughlin and Ben Marzinski: Subject: Followup Ping on Multipath Boot Procedure (Bug 445734) I'm currently looking over all my open documentation issues in the hope of addressing them in time for the RHEL 5.3 release, so this is a re-ping on my looking for information on a procedure for booting from a multipath device. The history of my correspondence on this is all documented in bug 445734. Instead of copying the whole history here in this email, I'll just provide the URL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445734 - Steven Levine It looks as though I will not have this information in time for the RHEL 5.4 release. I've checked the Need additional info box. This task is long standing and not much activity but never the less I'd like to offer some help. The environment involves a rack of HP DL360s connected via multipath fiber to an HP EVA4400. For ease of management, the goal is to have all the disks (including boot and root) mounted by their volume names. This works great in non-multipath environments but there seems to be issues with multipath. Specifically, it seems there may be a race condition where the mounting phase begins before multipath has fully settled. Other comments above mention LVM, but it isn't clear if that is a requirement. LVM is obsolete in virtual disk environments so this point should be clarified. If anyone attached to this bug would like some help testing and/or documenting please let me know. Created attachment 358602 [details]
Screen shot of potential multipath volume mount race condition
The attachment in comment #4 is a 2.3M uncompressed Windows bitmap (bmp) file not a jpeg as the attachment name suggests. Created attachment 358622 [details]
Screen shot of potential multipath volume mount race condition
Sorry about the bmp. I was stuck using Windows at the time which apparently can not save anything except bmp. This new upload is actually jpg.
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to propose this request, if appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to propose this request, if appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. This request was erroneously denied for the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. The error has been fixed and this request has been re-proposed for the current release. This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to propose this request, if appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. This bug has been around for a long time, and it should be in both RHEL 5 and RHEL 6, but it seems to be a question of resources in terms of providing the requested procedure as well as evaluating the information provided in Comments 3-6. The bug is in NEEDINFO from Ben Marzinski. I've set the dev_ack flag for 5.8, but I can't close this bug without the information that it requests. Um.. I'm not Oops. accidentally clicked on save changes early. I'm not sure that we actually support this in RHEL5. I've tried to switch to a multipathed root, from a regular root on one of my own machines, and I can't do it without some serious editting of /sbin/mkinitrd itself. CC'ing Brian Lane in case I'm missing something here, but it looks like mkinitrd won't setup a multipathed root initrd, unless you already have a multipathed root system. And getting a multipathed root system without a multipathed root initrd, is not an easy feat. Still waiting to hear final confirmation regarding Comment#18 that this isn't really supported, so for now I'm moving this to 5.9 (and will likely close it eventually). Moving to 5.10, so as not to lose this completely, but it still looks as if this isn't supported. Based on Comment 18, and the lack of dispute over Ben's assessment, I'm closing this as WONTFIX since it appears we don't support the procedure. |