Bug 446011

Summary: Footnotes (for URLs) aren't generating correctly in PDF
Product: [Community] Publican Reporter: Lana Brindley <lbrindle>
Component: publicanAssignee: Jeff Fearn <jfearn>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Michael Hideo <mhideo>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 2.0CC: jneedle, mhideo, mmcallis, publican-list
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Documentation
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: https://engineering.redhat.com/docbot/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_MRG/1.0/pdf/Messaging_Installation_Guide/
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 0.34 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-05-11 22:15:47 EDT Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:

Description Lana Brindley 2008-05-11 21:13:11 EDT
Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
publican-0.33-0.el5

How reproducible:
Every time.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create Book using Publican
2. Include an xref
3. Publish book to PDF
  
Actual results:
Footnote numbers doubled, and missing the footnote (containing the URL) at the
bottom of the page.

Expected results:
Footnotes are numbered sequentially and the appropriate note and URL appear at
the bottom of the page.

Additional info:
Notes on example found in
https://engineering.redhat.com/docbot/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_MRG/1.0/pdf/Messaging_Installation_Guide/
On page 1 of the PDF, you refer to the "Red Hat Enterprise MRG Supported
Hardware Page" with footnote 1.  First, you've already used footnote 1 on the
previous page, and second (and probably a side effect), there is no
corresponding footnote at the bottom of the page.

On Page 4, again there's no footnote for footnote 4.
Comment 1 Lana Brindley 2008-05-11 21:14:28 EDT
Oops - reproducible "every time" for this book. Probably not every time for
*every* book.

LKB
Comment 2 Jeff Fearn 2008-05-11 22:15:47 EDT
The footnote was inheriting it's font colour from the block containg the
footnote reference. Since these footnotes originated in a block with white text
the footnote was invisible.

Hardcoded the footnote font to black since footnotes will always be on a white
background.