Bug 446077
Summary: | get-fedora doesn't have link to boot.iso | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora Documentation | Reporter: | Ric Wheeler <rwheeler> |
Component: | docs-requests | Assignee: | Fedora Websites Team <web-members> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Karsten Wade <kwade> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | devel | CC: | dcantrell, eric, himanshu.sharmaa, nman64, redhat-bugzilla, stickster |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-06-26 21:20:18 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
David Woodhouse
2008-05-12 16:30:11 UTC
It should reference the Fedora-9-<arch>-netinst.iso instead (which is a hardlink to boot.iso). It'll exist in the isos dir, there is a sha1sum of it to verify, and the name is more clear than "boot.iso". Yes, that would be a good idea. Although we seem to have missed the release now, it's not too late to fix it... Is this something we should a) shoot for F12 and b) document in our Install Guide? I'd vote a) yes and b) yes. Who do we talk to about generating and posting net install ISOs? the isos are distributed on the mirrors. So they are generated and posted as part of the normal release duties. The links will be added later in the day once the Web team had though over this. So right now this bug will be on hold. Links have been added : http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora-all Bug Report is closed now. Tickets move to docs-request so the fedora-websites component can be removed per request from Ricky. |