Bug 446126
| Summary: | Don't explicitly list drm modules in scripts/mk-images | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jeremy Katz <katzj> |
| Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Jeremy Katz <katzj> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 9 | CC: | airlied, davej, dcantrell |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2009-02-16 20:32:12 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 446451 | ||
|
Description
Jeremy Katz
2008-05-12 21:11:08 UTC
Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping I think it's a little late to make this change for F10 (if it hasn't been done yet). Moving off to F11Target. So, anyone have any bright ideas on how we'd do this. For networking and the like, we make a modules.blah file based on symbol usage I guess that we could do modules.drm based on drm_open/drm_init sounds ok to me. airlied? yup sounds good to me. Kernel bit is committed and will show up in rawhide once there's a new kernel and anaconda piece has just been sent for review |