Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 446126
Don't explicitly list drm modules in scripts/mk-images
Last modified: 2013-01-09 23:41:46 EST
Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA.
More information and reason for this action is here:
I think it's a little late to make this change for F10 (if it hasn't been done yet). Moving off to F11Target.
So, anyone have any bright ideas on how we'd do this. For networking and the like, we make a modules.blah file based on symbol usage
I guess that we could do modules.drm based on drm_open/drm_init
sounds ok to me. airlied?
yup sounds good to me.
Kernel bit is committed and will show up in rawhide once there's a new kernel and anaconda piece has just been sent for review