Bug 446166

Summary: mesa depends on xorg-x11-proto-devel >= 7.3.12
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Zhan, Yi <yi.zhan>
Component: mesaAssignee: Adam Jackson <ajax>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: ajax
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-05-13 18:40:33 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 163350    

Description Zhan, Yi 2008-05-13 06:57:32 UTC
Description of problem:

mesa.spec says "BuildRequires: xorg-x11-proto-devel >= 7.1-10", but when build
mesa with xorg-x11-proto-devel-7.3.11 or lower versions below error would be
seen and build would fail:
 
checking for DRI2PROTO... configure: error: Package requirements (dri2proto >=
1.1) were not met:

Requested 'dri2proto >= 1.1' but version of DRI2Proto is 1.0.0

The full log can be found at
http://ia64.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=69914&name=build.log. 

I saw this on ia64 but I image this is not a architecture related issue.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
from mesa-7.1-0.25 to mesa-7.1-0.30

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Adam Jackson 2008-05-13 18:40:33 UTC
Fixed, mesa now requires dri2proto >= 1.1 explicitly.

I'm curious how you managed this though, 7.3-12 is the newest version available
in dist-f9.

Comment 2 Zhan, Yi 2008-05-14 02:33:07 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> Fixed, mesa now requires dri2proto >= 1.1 explicitly.
> 
> I'm curious how you managed this though, 7.3-12 is the newest version available
> in dist-f9.

Thanks for the quick fix. I'm in the fedora ia64's maintainer team. I had chance
to see this since mesa failed to build on ia64's koji for a while due to this.