Bug 447619
Summary: | Recursive obsoletes causes yum traceback | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Jesse Keating <jkeating> | ||||
Component: | yum | Assignee: | James Antill <james.antill> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | |||||
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | low | ||||||
Version: | 5.2 | CC: | borgan, dcantrell, ddumas, jhutar | ||||
Target Milestone: | rc | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2009-01-20 21:44:40 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Jesse Keating
2008-05-20 20:33:40 UTC
Created attachment 306181 [details]
Log file showing the traceback
libx86-devel has: rpm -qp --obsoletes libx86-devel-1.1-2.fc10.i386.rpm libx86-devel <= 1.1-2.fc10 That's probably wrong. Yeah, I totally expected it to be a packaging problem triggering this, however I do think that yum should gracefully fail here rather than 400 lines of traceback. I agree, but I'm sure we've fixed this since 3.2.8 ... so it should just disappear in 5.3. If you want it fixed before then, it basically means adding it to RHBA-2008:0487-02 ... but I don't think it's that important, is it? Probably not. I think we can safely update the Fedora builders to the yum that will be in 5.2. I just realized that we /are/ using what is close to the 5.2 package, so we'd have to pull an early release of what will be in 5.3. Until then when this comes up we'll get the odd tracebacks, which I suppose one can live with... This is fixed in the 5.3 candidate errata. An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0176.html |