Bug 450147

Summary: Ugly german transaction summary
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Jochen Schmitt <jochen>
Component: yumAssignee: Seth Vidal <skvidal>
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 9CC: ffesti, james.antill, katzj, pmatilai, tim.lauridsen
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Reopened
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-06-27 13:05:12 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Patch to fix reported issue.
none
Full de.po file none

Description Jochen Schmitt 2008-06-05 15:42:54 UTC 
If you have setting LANG="de.DE", the transaction summary display after yum was
running look ugly. That means, that the display numbers doesn't get a column.

Due the attached patch this issue may be fixed.
Comment 1 Jochen Schmitt 2008-06-05 15:42:54 UTC 
Created attachment 308444 [details]
Patch to fix reported issue.
Comment 2 Tim Lauridsen 2008-06-05 18:36:40 UTC 
Could you please attach the full updated de.po full, it is much easier to sumbit
Comment 3 Jochen Schmitt 2008-06-05 18:52:57 UTC 
Created attachment 308476 [details]
Full de.po file

The whole de.po file as requested.
Comment 4 Tim Lauridsen 2008-06-06 12:58:11 UTC 
Committed upstream
Comment 5 Jochen Schmitt 2008-06-26 18:21:09 UTC 
I have reopened this bug, becouse you don't have apply the offer patch to the
package to solve the issue.

I think setting 'closed upstream' may be ok, if there no solution for the
reported issue.

The Fedora policy says, the you should forwaarding patch of your package to
upstream, so they have the possiblity to integrating it in the upstream package,
but this doesn't mean that you should waiting for the upstream, if a patch exist
which fixed the issue.

Best Regards:

Jochen Schmitt
Comment 6 Seth Vidal 2008-06-27 13:05:12 UTC 
the patch was committed upstream. Tim doesn't have to forward the patch along to
upstream b/c he IS an upstream committer.