Bug 450147 - Ugly german transaction summary
Summary: Ugly german transaction summary
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: yum
Version: 9
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Seth Vidal
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-06-05 15:42 UTC by Jochen Schmitt
Modified: 2014-01-21 23:03 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-06-27 13:05:12 UTC
Type: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Patch to fix reported issue. (652 bytes, patch)
2008-06-05 15:42 UTC, Jochen Schmitt 		no flags Details | Diff
Full de.po file (51.73 KB, text/plain)
2008-06-05 18:52 UTC, Jochen Schmitt 		no flags Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Jochen Schmitt 2008-06-05 15:42:54 UTC 
If you have setting LANG="de.DE", the transaction summary display after yum was
running look ugly. That means, that the display numbers doesn't get a column.

Due the attached patch this issue may be fixed.
Comment 1 Jochen Schmitt 2008-06-05 15:42:54 UTC 
Created attachment 308444 [details]
Patch to fix reported issue.
Comment 2 Tim Lauridsen 2008-06-05 18:36:40 UTC 
Could you please attach the full updated de.po full, it is much easier to sumbit
Comment 3 Jochen Schmitt 2008-06-05 18:52:57 UTC 
Created attachment 308476 [details]
Full de.po file

The whole de.po file as requested.
Comment 4 Tim Lauridsen 2008-06-06 12:58:11 UTC 
Committed upstream
Comment 5 Jochen Schmitt 2008-06-26 18:21:09 UTC 
I have reopened this bug, becouse you don't have apply the offer patch to the
package to solve the issue.

I think setting 'closed upstream' may be ok, if there no solution for the
reported issue.

The Fedora policy says, the you should forwaarding patch of your package to
upstream, so they have the possiblity to integrating it in the upstream package,
but this doesn't mean that you should waiting for the upstream, if a patch exist
which fixed the issue.

Best Regards:

Jochen Schmitt
Comment 6 Seth Vidal 2008-06-27 13:05:12 UTC 
the patch was committed upstream. Tim doesn't have to forward the patch along to
upstream b/c he IS an upstream committer.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.