Bug 450484

OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistent macro usage.
OK - Has dist tag
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License (LGPLv2+)
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
[matej@viklef redhat]$ md5sum SOURCES/telepathy-sofiasip-0.5.8.tar.gz 
023dceb1d48f34b7a9d5614cfda25907  SOURCES/telepathy-sofiasip-0.5.8.tar.gz
[matej@viklef redhat]$ md5sum ~/telepathy-sofiasip-0.5.8.tar.gz 
023dceb1d48f34b7a9d5614cfda25907  /home/matej/telepathy-sofiasip-0.5.8.tar.gz
[matej@viklef redhat]$ 
See below - BuildRequires correct (build in koji)
Not Sure - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
%{_includedir}/%{name}-0.6/
do we have to have the number written there -- could not it be at least macro
somewhere in the top of the file? Or it won't change?

OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install

OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
OK - Builds in mock (koji)
OK - Builds on all supported archs

OK - final provides and requires are sane

Rpmlint is not silent!!!
[matej@viklef redhat]$ rpmlint -i RPMS/i386/telepathy-sofiasip-0.5.8-1.fc9.i386.rpm 
telepathy-sofiasip.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/include/telepathy-sofiasip-0.6/tpsip/event-target.h
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel
package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to
create a development package.

telepathy-sofiasip.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/include/telepathy-sofiasip-0.6/tpsip/sofia-decls.h
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel
package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to
create a development package.

[matej@viklef redhat]$ 

Well I know it is intentional -- but I really think making -devel package is not
that big deal, and I am quite sure there will be more devel files coming (they
always come). Are you sure about this?

and (cosmetic)

[matej@viklef redhat]$ rpmlint -i SRPMS/telepathy-sofiasip-0.5.8-1.fc9.src.rpm
telepathy-sofiasip.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab:
line 18)
The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a
cosmetic annoyance.  Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both.

[matej@viklef redhat]$ 

Just did :set et | retab | write 
in vim and attaching new .spec file

Conclusion:

I won't reject the review on the missing -devel package, but please consider
once again.

Created attachment 308820 [details]
spec file with fixed TABS

Persuaded on IRC about missing -devel package being The Right Thing™

APPROVED

New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: telepathy-sofiasip
Short Description: SIP connection manager for Telepathy
Owners: bpepple
Branches: F-9
InitialCC:
Cvsextras Commits: yes

cvs done.

Matej, thanks for the reivew!