Bug 451719
| Summary: | /usr/share/idl folder should be owned by filesystem package | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | petrosyan |
| Component: | filesystem | Assignee: | Ondrej Vasik <ovasik> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 11 | CC: | mclasen, pknirsch |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | filesystem-2.4.22-1.fc12 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2009-07-08 12:36:25 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
petrosyan
2008-06-16 21:14:58 UTC
Not sure how you come to that conclusion. It has two owners already, but it is used for wildly different things (e.g xulrunner has stuff in there, as well as bonobo, an dsome applications. This should probably go into filesystem. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Yes, it probably should be in filesystem - there are more such applications using that dir(and usually with subdir) - as interface description is very general term it could really by used for many different things. I added that to filesystem in filesystem-2.4.22-1.fc12 . Should this be used as tracker bug for separate bugreports against packages which do own this dir? (as probably all packages currently owning /usr/share/idl directory should no longer own it) Closing RAWHIDE - as it is done from side of filesystem... |