Bug 451719 - /usr/share/idl folder should be owned by filesystem package
/usr/share/idl folder should be owned by filesystem package
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: filesystem (Show other bugs)
11
All Linux
low Severity low
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Ondrej Vasik
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-06-16 17:14 EDT by petrosyan
Modified: 2009-07-08 08:36 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: filesystem-2.4.22-1.fc12
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-07-08 08:36:25 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description petrosyan 2008-06-16 17:14:58 EDT
Description of problem:
/usr/share/idl folder should be owned by gnome-panel package

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
gnome-panel-2.22.2-1.fc9

Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpm -qf /usr/share/idl/*
2. rpm -qf /usr/share/idl
Comment 1 Matthias Clasen 2008-10-02 09:50:05 EDT
Not sure how you come to that conclusion.
It has two owners already, but it is used for wildly different things (e.g xulrunner has stuff in there, as well as bonobo, an dsome applications.

This should probably go into filesystem.
Comment 2 Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 21:26:04 EST
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle.
Changing version to '10'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Comment 3 Ondrej Vasik 2009-07-07 10:55:38 EDT
Yes, it probably should be in filesystem - there are more such applications using that dir(and usually with subdir) - as interface description is very general term it could really by used for many different things.
Comment 4 Ondrej Vasik 2009-07-08 08:36:25 EDT
I added that to filesystem in filesystem-2.4.22-1.fc12 . Should this be used as tracker bug for separate bugreports against packages which do own this dir? (as probably all packages currently owning /usr/share/idl directory should no longer own it)
Closing RAWHIDE - as it is done from side of filesystem...

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.