Bug 452150
Summary: | Review Request: swarp - Tool that resamples and co-adds together FITS images | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Sergio Pascual <sergio.pasra> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Jason Tibbitts <j> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, notting |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | j:
fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-06-20 17:54:06 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Sergio Pascual
2008-06-19 16:50:48 UTC
Two observations: The pdf file is 1.5MB and three times the size of the rest of the package. Did you consider putting it in a separate package? I don't think it's a requirement but you know best how this package will be used. %{__mkdir_p} %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name} at the end of %install seems to be superfluous, as that directory is created (and swarp.xsl is installed there) by the install process. It seems to be harmless, though. I don't think either of these are blockers, though. * source files match upstream: 34e815d44f3b1c3c7bfdeb01bbdcf32d1eac239527a0937c3ed2b6f7be34bcee swarp-2.17.1.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. build root is OK. license field matches the actual license. license is open source-compatible. license text not included upstream. license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none). * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: swarp = 2.17.1-1.fc10 = (no non-glibc dependencies) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. There is a test directory containing one fits file, but it's not immediately clear what should be done with it. I ran the executable and gave it the test file and it did... something, without crashing, and didn't complain about it. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. ? documentation is 3x the rest of the package. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED Thanks, I will separate docs in the next release of the package New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: swarp Short Description: Tool that resamples and co-adds together FITS images Owners: sergiopr Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes cvs done. Built in rawhide |