Bug 453845
| Summary: | Update gnome-sharp to latest release (2.20) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Steven Garrity <steven> |
| Component: | gnome-sharp | Assignee: | Xavier Lamien <lxtnow> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 9 | CC: | lxtnow, sangu.fedora, the.masch |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2009-07-14 15:58:57 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 451492 | ||
|
Description
Steven Garrity
2008-07-02 22:05:28 UTC
yep, just need to update gtk-sharp-2.12 in order to do so. updating... hm...currently too many mono packages depends on that release and will brake dependencies on this part (this is the case on rawhide at this time). Please read the devel-list@ for more informations about. Also, could you tell me the importance to update gnome-do to 0.5 ? thx (In reply to comment #3) > Also, could you tell me the importance to update gnome-do to 0.5 ? Gnome-Do 0.5 just has a "bunch of cool new features" - new plugins, overall improvements, etc. (http://blog.davebsd.com/2008/06/09/gnome-do-05/). Nothing critical, just hoping not to have to wait four months for Fedora 10. hm...it seem to have some bugs fixed too. checked out the changelog after asked it. seem not to be shipped with the tarball (or maybe 'cause i don't look closer enough). anyways, i'll wait a up from other mono packages maintainers before go foward. Thanks fot your understanding. hm...it seem to have some bugs fixed too. checked out the changelog after asked it. seem not to be shipped with the tarball (or maybe 'cause i don't look closer enough). anyways, i'll wait a up from other mono packages maintainers before go foward. Thanks for your understanding. Do you plan to add this update in Fedora 9 ? How can i help you to do it? Thanks for all your support. Do you plan to add this update in Fedora 9 ? How can i help you to do it? Thanks for all your support. This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Fedora 9 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-07-10. Fedora 9 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. |